Academics worry about the foundations of the Welfare StateMonday, 24 September 2018 19:36
The academics feel it is extremely risky to make unemployment benefits more degressive, as was decided this summer under the Jobs Deal, a Government programme aimed at dealing with skills shortages.
They note that there is no scientific evidence that gradually reducing unemployment allowances would send more people looking for jobs. They also point out that unemployment insurance is supposed to protect the jobseeker against income loss. “Given this argument, too, it would be better for social benefits to increase with the length of unemployment rather than decrease,” they wrote.
"An even faster reduction in allowance levels could possibly run counter to what is economically justifiable,” the academics said in their conclusions. “Before taking decisions that could have very negative consequences for the foundations of our welfare State, the Government would be well advised to have this issue examined in the required depth.”
Federal Employment Minister Kris Peeters of the Christian Democratic and Flemish (CD&V) party has no apparent intention of rolling back the reform. His cabinet says that, whatever the modalities, the philosophy of the reform - questioned by the academics - will not be modified.
The Brussels Times
The UK government has developed a passport checker to allow British passport holders to see if they have enough time left on their passport before they travel to specific countries.
Amnesty International Belgium has launched a campaign to protest against the presence of Liege-based weapons manufacturer FN Herstal at an…
Brussels Airlines can now return to the normal schedule for its flights between Brussels and Kinshasa, the airline announced on…
Belgium, along with many other member states, will be allowed to increase state aid to farmers in times of crisis…
The environmental awareness-raising and action association, Nature & Progrès, on Tuesday started an appeal to mobilise support for a pesticide-free…