Plan to keep migrant families with children in closed centre comes in for criticismTuesday, 15 May 2018 15:24
However, this does not respect the best interest of the children, according to Sylvie Sarolea, a professor of Immigration Law at the Université catholique de Louvain (UCL – Catholic University of Leuven).
The 1989 International Convention on the Rights of the Child, ratified by Belgium, states in its article 3 that "in all actions concerning children […] the best interest of the child shall be a primary consideration,” Ms Sarolea noted. This means that “when you weigh the interest of the child and that of the State to control its borders for example, the former has more weight. It does not exclude the interest of the State, but is stronger than it,” she added.
For the interest of the State to take precedence, it must “demonstrate forcefully that detaining a child makes its immigration policy more effective”, whereas this is not the case, Ms Sarolea explained. “We can say that in the present state of affairs that demonstration has not been made.”
Moreover, child psychiatrists have shown for many years now the “dramatic” consequences of detaining a child, she stressed, adding, “even if the policy were effective, given the violence done to the child, the measure would still be a problem”.
Additionally, Art.37 of the Convention states that detaining a child can only be used as a last resort, whereas “the State of Belgium has not convinced us that this is really a last resort because a whole range of guarantees have not been put in place,” Ms Sarolea pointed out, especially since Belgium has already been condemned on three occasions by the European Court of Human Rights for detaining children in closed centres.
“It’s not because these (housing units) will be newer and renovated that the conditions change. You can draw giraffes on walls, but they’ll still be walls,” she added.
The immigration law expert also pointed to a child rights committee linked to the 1989 Convention that was established two years ago, and which issues “communications” and not rulings. She stressed that this committee could very well state that Belgium is violating the law and is guilty of illegal behaviour, an argument that the families concerned could use in a court of law.
The Brussels Times
The service UberX, which connects passengers with professional drivers, respects the Brussels legal framework for the industry, according to a…
Zipcar, one of the car-sharing companies currently active in Europe, will pull out of the Brussels market at the end…
The Brussels region's housing agency SLRB has notified the Brussels prosecutor's office of an audit carried out on the housing…
The Federal Government’s Jobs Deal bill incorporates none of the 20 remarks made by Brussels, the region’s minister in charge…