What are the implications of the European Court of Justice Invalidation of the Safe Harbor Agreement?
Share article:
Share article:

What are the implications of the European Court of Justice Invalidation of the Safe Harbor Agreement?

© Court of Justice of the European Union
© Court of Justice of the European Union

In a much publicised ruling, the European Court of Justice declared on 6 October 2015 that the European Commission’s US Safe Harbor agreement is invalid. The ruling is expected to have important implications for internet cloud operators and social networks as well as for organisations that use cloud services based in the US to store personal data.

In response to the ruling, Commissioner Věra Jourová clarified at a press conference in Strasbourg, that the Safe Harbor principle is no longer applicable and that businesses will need to apply the other mechanisms available in the Data Protection Directive and Commission decisions until a new agreement with US authorities is in place. Alternatives include the Commission’s model clauses for transferring data to third countries without adequate data protection laws. There are also limited exceptions (as pointed out by Ms. Jourová at the press conference), but in most cases it will be necessary to have an agreement with data subjects with free and informed consent which raises particular issues in contexts where there is a preexisting relationship with the data subject, e.g. employees, as well as for consumer services where users are unlikely to read the terms that they agree to. 

In addition to invalidating the Safe Harbor agreement, the court also held that the Commission does not have the competence to restrict national supervisory authorities’ powers in the way that the Safe Harbor scheme did. In particular, the national supervisory authorities must be able to examine, with complete independence, whether the transfer of a person’s data to a third country complies with the requirements in the directive. Arguably, this opens for the possibility that the Commission’s model clauses are open to being deemed inadequate.

Additional noteworthy points made by the court include:

– National US law prevails over the Safe Harbor agreement which in effect means that the Safe Harbor principles would have to be discarded in case of conflict with national law, and the Safe Harbor scheme thus enables the interference with fundamental rights of EU citizens.

– The Safe Harbor scheme does not allow for legal recourse for the rectification and access of stored data, and that in itself is a breach of the fundamental right to effective judicial protection.

Ms. Jourová also confirmed at the press conference that the commission will start working towards a new “safer safe harbor” agreement in parallel with the ongoing negotiation of the new data protection regime. In particular, she highlighted the need for a coordinated response from the 28 national supervisory authorities. She added that the commission will present guidelines in the coming weeks to aid businesses following the ruling. 

By Christian Ernhede 
Swedish EU lawyer at PRUDENS

Latest news

Eating less meat won’t actually help much with Flemish CO2 emissions
When it comes to the ways in which ordinary people can help to reduce CO2 emissions, eating less meat is often touted as an important solution. ...
At least one in seven coronavirus patients suffers from long-term Covid
Six months after becoming infected with the coronavirus, at least one in seven people still show symptoms connected to the infection, varying from ...
Operation Sky ECC: Major arrests and another large scale operation
A major operation took place last night in Belgium as a result of Operation Sky ECC, the name given to an investigation into organised crime that ...
Consultative Committee expected to discuss telework and state of emergency
On Tuesday afternoon, Belgium's Consultative Committee will be meeting earlier than expected to discuss the worsening epidemiological situation. ...
Highest number of new Covid-19 cases recorded since November 2020
The number of people testing positive for the coronavirus in Belgium is continuing to increase and has now reached levels last recorded in November ...
Prototype test plane crashes in Belgium after pilot ejects
A prototype aircraft crashed on Sunday afternoon in Yves-Gomezée (Walcourt, Namur province) during a test flight, according to several local media ...
EU questions Israeli decision to ban Palestinian NGOs
The Israeli government’s decision on Friday to outlaw six Palestinian civil society organisations operating in the West Bank has caused consternation ...
Gare Maritime: Brussels’ most exciting new architectural project
A generation ago, the Gare Maritime in the Tour & Taxis industrial site was an abandoned wasteland. It is now a model for urban renewal and ...
More politicians than ordinary citizens at the Conference on the Future of Europe
The second Plenary of the Conference took place on Saturday in the European Parliament in Strasbourg and discussed the contributions from the ...
Belgium’s Consultative Committee will meet today
The next meeting of Belgium's Consultative Committee, scheduled for Friday, has been brought forward to Tuesday at 4:30 PM, according to local media ...
Coca-Cola, Pepsi and Unilever are world’s biggest plastic polluters
Coca-Cola, Pepsi, and Unilever were found to be the world's biggest polluters of plastic in a report published by Branded on Monday. Over 11,000 ...
Four men charged with illegally buying thousands of live ducks to hunt on private land
Four Belgian men will appear in court on Monday facing charges related to the purchase of thousands of ducks, which were then released into a private ...