'A disgrace': Belgium under fire for abstaining on EU nature restoration law

'A disgrace': Belgium under fire for abstaining on EU nature restoration law
Zuhal Demir, Flemish Environment with Vivianne Heijnen Dutch Environment Minister, and Frans Timmermans, Executive Vice-President of the European Commission at the Council of the EU meeting on 20 June 2023. Credit: European Union

Belgium was on Tuesday one of the few Member States to not support the EU Council's agreement on the nature restoration law, having abstained alongside Austria.

The Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Italy and Poland voted against the agreement. Despite the Belgian abstention, a common position was adopted by a majority of EU Ministers of the Environment. The agreement will be used in negotiations with the European Parliament, with both EU bodies having to agree on the law in order for the bill to be enacted.

For the environmental organisation WWF, the Belgian abstention is a "disgrace", as Belgian ministers failed to agree on the law. The Brussels and Walloon Environment ministers supported the proposal, but it was opposed by the Flemish side.

At Tuesday's Council meeting, Belgium was represented by Zuhal Demir, Flemish Environment Minister and member of the Flemish nationalist party N-VA.

"Now that the negotiations are allowed to start, we want to continue to weigh in on the adjustments to the nature restoration law," Demir said after Tuesday's vote.

A tug-of-war over habitats

Demir was sent to the Council with a mandate to negotiate additional guarantees for the individual Member States' nature restoration plans, like ensuring that the states will not be sanctioned by the Commission.

The proposal was able to pass without approval from Belgium, as the text was approved by 20 Member States, representing over 65% of the European bloc's population.

Nevertheless, Frans Timmermans, the Vice-President of the EU Commission, addressed Minister Demir after the agreement was adopted, seemingly reassuring her. According to reports from De Tijd, the Commission Vice-President promised that Member States will have "maximum flexibility" for their nature restoration plans.

It is not the first time that Timmermans and Demir have locked horns. The Flemish Minister accused Timmermans of polarising the debate around nature restoration, while Timmermans has expressed being deeply disappointed by Demir's attitude towards climate regulations.

Demir has been a vocal critic of many EU green regulations, and the nature restoration law is another point of tension, as she deemed it harmful to Flemish businesses. In May, she welcomed the Belgian Prime Minister's calls for a "pause" on environmental regulation.

The nature restoration law is a regulation aiming to recover Europe's natural habitats - 80% of which are in poor status, according to EU Commission estimates. The agreement put forth by the Swedish Presidency of the Council is weaker than previous versions but nevertheless imposes legal obligations to restore 30% of damaged ecosystems by 2030.

According to Frans Timmermans, the debate around nature restoration, and climate regulation in general, has been needlessly polarised by party politics.

"For almost four years, this was the consensus, also with the EPP, that these are issues that are of such existential importance that we do not create a left-right political dynamic on them. I hope we go back to that situation," Timmermans commented after the Council meeting on Tuesday.

'A disgrace for Belgium'

Environmental organisation WWF dubbed the abstention as "a disgrace for Belgium", pointing out that the country was a supporter of the bill at the last meeting of EU environment ministers in December.

"In the space of six months, Belgium has gone from being a supporter of this law to a country that is abstaining," said Reine Spiessens, head of biodiversity advocacy at WWF.

Related News

"During the many talks that will follow, we encourage Belgium to join the countries that support this law and to co-adopt together an ambitious law on nature restoration," Spiessens added.

The environmental NGO expressed particular disappointment towards Minister Demir's decision to keep opposing the law, even after, on Friday she had said that the new draft agreement was heading "in the right direction".


Copyright © 2024 The Brussels Times. All Rights Reserved.