Hard or soft power: How to combat disinformation in social media

Thursday, 29 March 2018 13:56
The term “fake news” is favoured by politicians to discredit journalists. The term “fake news” is favoured by politicians to discredit journalists.
The European Commission published in March a report by an expert group on fake news and disinformation in social media. The experts have chosen a soft approach to tackle the problem in contrast to a hard approach based on regulation and competing counter-measures.
The high-level expert group deliberately avoided the term “fake news”, saying that it is inadequate to capture the complex problems of disinformation that also involves content which blends fabricated information with facts.

Disinformation is defined as false, inaccurate, or misleading information designed, presented and promoted for profit or to intentionally cause public harm. This can threaten democratic processes and values and can specifically target a variety of sectors in society.

The expert group received nearly 3000 replies to a public consultation launched in November 2017. Intentional disinformation aimed at influencing elections and migration policies were the top two categories where most respondents thought fake news were most likely to cause harm to society.

According to the latest Eurobarometer survey, 83 % of the respondents perceive that the existence of news or information that misrepresent reality or is even false represents a danger to democracy.

At a recent debate at Brussels Press Club, the two panelists agreed on the definition of disinformation but prescribed different measures to tackle the problem.

Rand Waltzman, senior information scientist at RAND Corporation said that the term “fake news” might be catchy but should be replaced by “disinformation”, which has a long history in marketing and political or religious propaganda. The difference today is that anyone can disseminate disinformation on social media. Government agencies can carry out denial of servers attacks to manipulate entire populations.

Ricardo Gutierrez, general secretary of the European Federation of Journalists, added that the term “fake news” is used by politicians to discredit journalists. Disinformation can be false or genuine information which in both cases is knowingly shared to cause harm.

Disinformation can take many forms and perhaps the most serious threat to democracy has been the interference of foreign powers to subvert other countries´ elections.

As member of the Commission’s expert group, Gutierrez shares its soft power and collaboration approach, in particular promoting “media literacy”.

“The challenge is to regain trust in media,” he said. He opposes legislative measures such as the Network Enforcement Law in Germany (“Facebook law”) which criminalizes vaguely defined forms of “disinformation” and shifts the responsibility to private companies to “censor” content on-line.

For Waltzman the soft approach is naïve. “Everyone can be a victim of disinformation”, he said. “The crucial question is what the target group is willing to believe.”

According to Waltzman, most people do not read debunks of fake news by quality media and fact-checking organisations, and if they do, the damage has already been done. “We have to proactively modify the media environment,” he suggested, “and outcompete those disseminating disinformation.”

Gutierrez countered with “We have never tried to teach media literacy. To combat fire with fire doesn’t seem to be the right and effective strategy.”

Asked by The Brussels Times about the development of algorithms to identify “fake news”, he replied: “These algorithms are framed to increase the revenue of social media companies and aren’t contributing to the public interest.”

Good journalism, as a public good, is the right option to tackle disinformation, he said and referred to the five pillars in the expert group’s report.

A global multidimensional soft approach

  1. enhance transparency of online news, involving an adequate and privacy-compliant sharing of data about the systems that enable their circulation online;
  2. promote media and information literacy to counter disinformation and help users navigate the digital media environment;
  3. develop tools for empowering users and journalists to tackle disinformation and foster a positive engagement with fast-evolving information technologies;
  4. safeguard the diversity and sustainability of the European news media ecosystem, and
  5. promote continued research on the impact of disinformation in Europe to evaluate the measures taken by different actors and constantly adjust the necessary responses.
M.Apelblat
The Brussels Times
Google Plus

More Stories

Wines and spirits federation wants more breathalyser tests in public places

Wines and spirits federation wants more breathalyser tests in public places

The Belgian Federation of Wines and Spirits, Vinum Et Spiritus, has decided to support the Emile Leus Fund in its efforts to have more alcohol detectors installed in public places.

Belgium, France could need to supply each other with energy this winter

Belgium, France could need to supply each other with energy this winter

The security of France’s electricity supply should be guaranteed this winter, according to the country’s electricity transmission company, RTE, but extra care will need to be taken in January-February and if demand outstrips production, France could need energy from Belgium during those two months.

The year 2018 looks set to be one of Belgium’s driest

The year 2018 looks set to be one of Belgium’s driest

With a month and a half to go before the end of the year, 2018 has had only 118 rainy days, which is within reach of the previous annual record of 143 rainless days, dating back to 2003.