Days after climate march, Belgium votes against EU energy-saving measures

Wednesday, 05 December 2018 09:40
Days after climate march, Belgium votes against EU energy-saving measures © Belga
Yesterday in Brussels, just two days after up to 75,000 people had marched through the city calling for more government action on tackling climate change, the federal minister for the environment, who had been present on the march, voted against one proposal from the EU Commission on improving energy efficiency, and abstained on another on renewable energy.
The vote came up at a meeting of the environment council, attended by Marie-Christine Marghem, who had caused controversy by using the occasion of the march – a show of solidarity attended by members of the public from across the country – to lay the blame for lack of progress at the feet of the regions, and in particular Flanders.

Later, the Belgian permanent representative to the EU revealed that his service had been asked to attempt to form a blocking minority to the directive on energy efficiency. In the end, the attempt failed, with only the Czech Republic joining Belgium among the nays.

Defending the Belgian votes on RTBF radio, Marghem (pictured in parliament) took refuge behind the Belgian way of doing things, and the need to find consensus among the regions on matters where they have competence – such as environment and energy. On the question of energy efficiency, none of the three regions could agree to the increase demanded by the directive. For the question of renewable energy, Flanders could not agree, while Brussels was in favour and Wallonia wanted to abstain.

When the situation arises where the regions cannot agree one way or the other, the custom is for the federal minister to abstain. Both directives derive directly from the Paris Accords.

Marghem was accused of “political cowardice” by Greenpeace and Climate Coalition representative Juliet Boulet.

“Hiding behind the regions is, in my view, a confession of terrible weakness, and also, if I may say so, a little like political cowardice,” she told the RTBF. “It seems to me that with a little bit of political will, all four parties could have found an agreement. In Paris in 2015, 195 states were able to come to a worldwide agreement. Here, we’re unable to agree among four parties.”

Alan Hope
The Brussels Times
Google Plus

More Stories

Entrepreneurs lay more than €300 million on table for medical research

Entrepreneurs lay more than €300 million on table for medical research

Urbain Vandeurzen, one of Belgium’s leading business entrepreneurs, has committed to spending €200 million through one of his companies to pay for research into Alzheimer’s disease.

March against Marrakesh can go ahead, says Council of State

March against Marrakesh can go ahead, says Council of State

The so-called March against Marrakesh, planned to take place in Brussels on Sunday, can go ahead despite a ban by the Brussels region, the Council of State has ruled.

Michel wants EU sanctions against people behind disinformation campaigns

Michel wants EU sanctions against people behind disinformation campaigns

Belgian Prime Minister Charles Michel said on Friday on the margins of a summit in Brussels that he would like the European Commission to be able to conduct investigations and possibly take action against people who carry out disinformation campaigns to try and “destabilise democracies”.