Both Belgian Yannick Carrasco and British Jordan Henderson's recent moves to foreign leagues have garnered significant attention, and been scrutinised by fans, media and advocacy groups alike.
Belgian Red Devil Yannick Carrasco, a talented winger, opted to transfer to Saudi Arabian club Al-Shabab, while Jordan Henderson, former Liverpool captain and LGBTQ+ rights advocate, joined Al Ettifaq (a team also in the Saudi Arabian Pro League). These decisions have sparked discussions about financial interests, sporting ambitions and human rights concerns.
Yannick Carrasco's transfer to Saudi Arabia raised eyebrows among football fans and human rights organisations alike. At the age of 30, Carrasco made the surprising move to Al-Shabab, leaving behind the European football elite. His reasoning was rooted in a desire for certainty, both in terms of playing time and financial security.
Pragmatic choices
Carrasco acknowledged in a press conference that, at his age and with his contract at Atlético Madrid coming to an end, he needed to make a pragmatic choice. His only concrete offer came from Saudi Arabia, and he emphasised the growing risk of injuries in football due to the demanding schedule. Carrasco had seen first-hand how injuries could impact a player's career, citing the case of national team colleague Axel Witsel's Achilles tendon injury just before his last year of contract with Borussia Dortmund.
While some may argue that the player prioritised financial gain over his sporting ambitions, his desire for certainty and belief that he could maintain his level in Saudi Arabia played a significant role in his decision. He also denied that playing in the Saudi league was a step backwards, noting the presence of other European stars in the league. Carrasco saw it as an opportunity to continue his career and embark on a new adventure.
Human rights concerns
One of the most contentious aspects of Carrasco's move was his attitude towards Saudi Arabia's human rights record. When confronted on the issue, Carrasco affirmed that he did not support the claims made by human rights organisations. He referenced the experiences of other high-profile footballers – such as Cristiano Ronaldo – who appeared to lead normal lives in the country.
Carrasco emphasised the difficulty of passing judgment on a nation solely based on hearsay, highlighting the importance of experiencing it first-hand. He stated that Saudi Arabia was a beautiful country and there was nothing about it that warranted his concern.
Carrasco's comments echo those of former Liverpool captain Jordan Henderson after his move to Al Ettifaq, which sparked controversy due to the country's laws criminalising homosexuality. As a prominent advocate for LGBTQ+ rights during his time with the Premier League club, Henderson faced criticism for his decision.
Henderson expressed regret if his move was perceived as turning his back on LGBTQ+ rights in an interview with The Athletic. He said that he intended to continue supporting causes and communities, but also acknowledged the importance of respecting the local culture and values in Saudi Arabia.
Related News
- 'We can do it': Red Devils expecting at least 2,000 travelling fans in Austria
- Spanish football's #MeToo moment shines light on sexism in the sport
The decisions made by Yannick Carrasco and Jordan Henderson to pursue their football careers in Saudi Arabia highlight the multifaceted nature of professional football transfers.
These moves underscore the importance of considering the broader cultural and political contexts when discussing football transfers. Players such as Carrasco and Henderson must navigate a complex media landscape, where their decisions are often debated.
Ultimately, their choices reflect their individual priorities, aspirations and beliefs, reminding us that the world of football is not merely about the game on the pitch but also the complex decisions made off it.
